A little test I've been doing with viewing images in various browsers

It seems that (at least on my machine… a Macbook Air, Mountain Lion, Chrome v 22), that Chrome is desaturating my original images, while displaying them in Safari is softening them compared to the original.
  In the past few months, Chrome has added color management so it understands the colorspace correctly, but I don't understand what's happening with saturation.
  The first image in the album is the original uploaded one. The next two here are screen snapshots from Chrome & Safari, from Lightbox view.
 The last one is a screen capture with two Safari windows open, one in G+, one from the file uploaded from LR to Google Drive.
  What do you see with your particular operating system/browser?

Update Finally figured out that the big culprit here was that I was calibrating my monitor with a ColorMunki Photo set to generate ICC v4 profiles… and Chrome only understands v2. 

Google+: View post on Google+

30 thoughts on “  A little test I've been doing with viewing images in various browsers

  1. Ok. Hmm. back to the drawing board. In Lightroom it is definitely more saturated (more similar to the Safari snapshot). A mystery I'll have to pursue more another day…

  2. Ok. Hmm. back to the drawing board. In Lightroom it is definitely more saturated (more similar to the Safari snapshot). A mystery I'll have to pursue more another day…

  3. Ok +Ron Clifford & +Brad Thompson (and anyone else who'd like to 'play along' and hasn't gotten sick of the whole thing) This is still driving me nuts! 
       Here's a RAW exported as TIFF to Photoshop from Lightroom, 'Convert to Profile' changed to sRGB, saved as JPG, and uploaded to Google Drive (so we know there's no behind-the-scenes fiddling with recompressing the file).
    At this link, go to the File menu, and download the jpg and open it with Photoshop. 
     https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qUve5_E1BlRDNBZWU2Sm9YU00/edit?pli=1
      For me, LR and PS versions look identical, but Chrome and IE have reduced saturation (particularly noticeable in the greens). So if it looks the same to you every step of the way, I'll be scratching my head about which component of the color workflow is messing me up.

  4. Ok +Ron Clifford & +Brad Thompson (and anyone else who'd like to 'play along' and hasn't gotten sick of the whole thing) This is still driving me nuts! 
       Here's a RAW exported as TIFF to Photoshop from Lightroom, 'Convert to Profile' changed to sRGB, saved as JPG, and uploaded to Google Drive (so we know there's no behind-the-scenes fiddling with recompressing the file).
    At this link, go to the File menu, and download the jpg and open it with Photoshop. 
     https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qUve5_E1BlRDNBZWU2Sm9YU00/edit?pli=1
      For me, LR and PS versions look identical, but Chrome and IE have reduced saturation (particularly noticeable in the greens). So if it looks the same to you every step of the way, I'll be scratching my head about which component of the color workflow is messing me up.

  5. +Heather Webb Ron & I have been having a bit of private back-and-forth on this. I think we've narrowed it down to an issue with color profile settings hidden somewhere on my machine which are causing desaturation of images displayed in Chrome (but only for me). 
      Since some of the pics in this album are screen snapshots, so I would expect some variation in sharpness. I'm trying to figure out color variations at this point.

  6. +Heather Webb Ron & I have been having a bit of private back-and-forth on this. I think we've narrowed it down to an issue with color profile settings hidden somewhere on my machine which are causing desaturation of images displayed in Chrome (but only for me). 
      Since some of the pics in this album are screen snapshots, so I would expect some variation in sharpness. I'm trying to figure out color variations at this point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *